Piper Sonoma Brut Sparkling Wine
It is hard to believe that two weeks have gone by since I wrote about the 2012 London Olympics Opening Ceremony and our wine filled weekend. Suffice it to say my DVR and wine cellar [yes, still the guest room] have seen a lot of action since then. The events in London have kept the world enthralled so what better way to celebrate than with a sparkling wine.
This is my first time drinking this sparkler from Piper’s main house: Piper Heidsieck. Produced in California’s Sonoma County; it cannot be called Champagne. Usually priced at under $20.00 and sometimes even under $15.00 this bubbly would compare in price to California’s Chandon and Washington State’s Domaine Ste. Michelle. I paid $13.99 reduced from $19.00 at a Winn-Dixie grocery store.
The Brut blend is; 60% Chardonnay, 15% Pinot Noir and 25% Pinot Meunier. The aging is done on lees for a minimum of 18 months. As per Wine Spectator– This sparkling wine is made from hand-picked Champagne grapes grown in the Northern reaches of Sonoma County and the wine is aged on the yeast for a minimum 2½ year period of time. This gives the wine a complex bread-yeast aroma and lightly yeasty flavor. The wine is aged in large, French oak barrels (1625 gallon barrel foudres), before bottling and secondary fermentation. By aging this wine in oak, there is imparted to the wine a toasty/vanilla character in addition to the light apple and lemon flavors that the wine ordinarily possesses.
I found it interesting that this NV (Non-Vintage) Cuvée is produced by blending reserve wines from various years to produce a wine that has consistent flavor. Pale gold straw in color, its yeasty aroma on the nose was most noticeable at first. As the wine expanded and warmed scents such as green apple, vanilla and peach and even plum were also detected. The same was noted on the palate. The plum [dark fruit] flavor I at least attribute to the Pinot’s in the blend.
I enjoyed Piper’s NV Cuvée would buy it again and would whole heartedly recommend it to others. I would be interested in trying it along side the other sparkling wines I mentioned such as Chandon and Domaine Ste. Michelle. Even more so with a true French version. There are a lot of sparklers and even Champagne’s out there in the under $20.00 range to taste and I would be glad to volunteer my services 🙂 In fact I think I may have just thought of our next post 2012 Olympics “theme” for a night in with friends….. ¡SALUD!
- Bubble, bubble … over ice it’s no trouble (miamiherald.com)
- A Wine for Tonight: NV Domaine Ste. Michelle Blanc de Noirs (winepeeps.com)
Just a good old cup of tea for me this time. Typically British 🙂
Good closing ceremony so far. Shame it’s all ending. The atmosphere around London for the last two weeks has been brilliant. After the negativity around town in the build up to the games we now wish the games could continue. Sorry it has to end.
A good example of gotta try what’s in the store so you can promote it. 🙂 Thanks for the suggestion that I may not have tried. BTW … for some reason I’m thinking that Wine Spectator gave the thumbs up to low-end Barefoot bubbly. Have you tried it?
Continuing on your theme 🙂 Yes we carry it, we have 2 versions I believe, I am going to have to try it!
I am starting to like these homework assignments LOL.
I personally prefer the Domaine Ste. Michelle to Piper or Chandon but wouldn’t turn down a glass. AFrankangle mentions the Barefoot, I have tried it and found it sweeter than the others. Thanks for sharing the process, I had no idea that it is so long or complicated.
In mentioning the NV (non vintage) aspect of these wines I was curious about your knowledge about the difference between NV and vintage sparkling wines. Is the taste substantially different between NV and V in the same winery? Do V sparklers have a longer shelf life? Are they even meant to be cellared for a long period? More homework for you 🙂
Pingback: HARK – The Holidays Approacheth!! « Whine And Cheers For Wine